Hold Up, You Don’t Need More Training Volume?

Among many debated resistance training topics is optimizing training volume. Natural Fitness and Figure champion Holly Baxter recently discussed a study by Enes and colleagues from the University of Tampa, which examined whether increasing volume weekly causes muscle growth versus keeping sets the same per training cycle. (1)

The Study’s Variables 

Thirty recreationally trained women were randomly assigned to one of three training protocols over 12 weeks:

• Constant volume group: 22 sets of quad exercises weekly.
• Moderate progression group: Started at 16 weekly sets and increased by two sets each two weeks for 26 total sets.
• Aggressive progression group: Began with 18 sets weekly, adding four sets every two weeks for 38 total sets.

Volunteers trained three exercises—leg presses, squats, and leg extensions—twice weekly. To maximize the working sets, the first two sets of each exercise were performed with approximately two reps in reserve, and the final set was pushed to failure.

[Related: Learn How to Do the Stiff-Legged Deadlift Like Dorian Yates]

The Verdict 

After the 12-week experiment, muscle thickness was remeasured along the vastus lateralis (outer quad muscle) at 30, 50, and 70 percent lengths. Cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured at the 50% mark for the vastus lateralis. 

Measuring only part of a muscle is an inaccurate way to assess results since muscles don’t necessarily grow uniformly across their length, also known as regional hypertrophy. (2)(3)

Researchers found no significant differences in overall muscle growth between the three groups. However, the highest volume group had the most vastus lateralis growth at 50 percent length, but not much more than other groups.

The moderate and aggressive progression groups showed similar growth, while no statistical difference was observed between the constant and mild groups. These findings suggest that scaling training volume with diminishing returns may be beneficial. However, muscle growth is more complex than a single study with limited factors.

Limitations 

A recent study by the same research team, conducted on males, showed minimal added benefit of weekly volume increases. (4) “The differences in the population and overall volume could explain the differences between these studies,” Baxter theorized. 

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Holly Tiarne Baxter (@hollytbaxter)

Moreover, the study on females did not include a non-exercise control group, making it difficult to determine the reliability of the measurement tools. Another constraint is only assessing quad growth, which might not apply to other muscles.

Baxter’s Key Takeaways & Tips

How does this data translate to programming your workouts? Here are Baxter’s five tips:

1. Start with an adequate baseline volume
   • Aim for a minimum of 10-20 sets per muscle group weekly. (5)
2. Gradually, progress sets & reps
   • Add one to two sets every few weeks.
3. Monitor progress or lack thereof
   • Watch for signs of overtraining, like excessive soreness, fatigue, and declining performance.
4. An individualized approach is key 
   • People respond differently to volume changes. Adjust as needed. (6)
5. Volume is only one factor
   • Sufficient progressive overload, intensity, technique, rep tempo, and training close to failure can maximize muscle gains.

While increasing training volume is necessary, chasing higher set counts should be strategic.

More Bodybuilding Content

• How Tristyn Lee and Breon Ansley Push Their Lateral Raise Limits
• Divisions Collide — Martin Fitzwater and Keone Pearson Tag Team Leg Day
• Samson Dauda on 2024 Mr. Olympia Win: “That Was My F***-You Moment”

References

1. Enes, A., Correa, C. L., Bernardo, M. F., Salles, G. N., Oneda, G., Leonel, D. F., Fleck, S. J., Phillips, S. M., De Souza, E. O., & Souza-Junior, T. P. (2025). Does increasing the resistance-training volume lead to greater gains? The effects of weekly set progressions on muscular adaptations in females. Journal of sports sciences, 1–12. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2459003
2. Wakahara, T., Miyamoto, N., Sugisaki, N., Murata, K., Kanehisa, H., Kawakami, Y., Fukunaga, T., & Yanai, T. (2012). Association between regional differences in muscle activation in one session of resistance exercise and in muscle hypertrophy after resistance training. European journal of applied physiology, 112(4), 1569–1576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2121-y
3. Diniz, R. C. R., Tourino, F. D., Lacerda, L. T., Martins-Costa, H. C., Lanza, M. B., Lima, F. V., & Chagas, M. H. (2022). Does the Muscle Action Duration Induce Different Regional Muscle Hypertrophy in Matched Resistance Training Protocols?. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 36(9), 2371–2380. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003883
4. Enes, A., DE Souza, E. O., & Souza-Junior, T. P. (2024). Effects of Different Weekly Set Progressions on Muscular Adaptations in Trained Males: Is There a Dose-Response Effect?. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 56(3), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003317
5. Bernárdez-Vázquez, R., Raya-González, J., Castillo, D., & Beato, M. (2022). Resistance Training Variables for Optimization of Muscle Hypertrophy: An Umbrella Review. Frontiers in sports and active living, 4, 949021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.949021
6. Lim, C., Nunes, E. A., Currier, B. S., McLeod, J. C., Thomas, A. C. Q., & Phillips, S. M. (2022). An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Mechanisms of Resistance Exercise-Induced Human Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 54(9), 1546–1559. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002929

Featured image: @hollytbaxter on Instagram